Apparently big hype has surrounded the returning character for episode 16 promise,would pete be appearing?,rumours were abound it may be emily dinsmore come back to kidnap lana and ruin the wedding also some have said it could be zod coming back to claim his dna soaked kid that lies in lana's womb.Well big let down it's actually nell potter lana's guardian last seen marrying dean potter the real estate guy and moving to sunny climbs when lana moved in with chloe.Is that a missed chance by the writers do you think?.

ignore the above post

Which has now been deleted

What!!! Nell Potter!! That is the biggest let down in the history of the show. Why couldn't they have zod come back or one of his cronies from the phantom zone? I am guessing that Clark will not be attending the wedding, given the bad blood between him and lana as well as lex.

quote:

What!!! Nell Potter!! That is the biggest let down in the history of the show.

Really? There's quite alot to choose from

It would have been good to see Pete. I´m sure the writers could have come up with something a little more imaginative than Nell. She wasn´t even a main character when she was still about!

Thank you Jonny, yes it would have been better and more interseting than Nell Potter. By the way ninja this for me is one of the biggest let downs for me, however upon reflection the writters getting rid of Johnathon Kent rather, than the tired looking Lana was the biggest let down for me. That a learning that Lionel might not be making too much of an appearence in season 6 as I love the way Clark reacted in season 5 every time Lionel called him son.

Hi ya cloud,just a word on the jonathan thing ,if the writers were going to stick to even the basic story of superman then the first person to die had to be his father.I also think lana get's a bad press from most sites i visit.Everyone usually hates her when she and clark are apart and love her when clark and her are together,the poor girl can't win.Here's hoping that the writers deliver on their promise which was stated at the beginning that the whole story was based around the bittersweet romance of clark and lana,bittersweet meaning things will turn out right in the end,right?.
As for lionel i love him and he has not had a story line worthy of the name in season six
which is a shame.

I do agree with you russian, but it will get tiresome if they drag the Clark and Lana bittersweet thing out too long. I don't know why Clark dosen't give it a go with Chloe, she obviously has feelings for him and I didn't see Clark object when she kissed him in Vessel.

I think judging by what i have seen they appear to have missed that chance,it would appear lana is very close to knowing clark's secret and if that comes to pass probably season six end/season seven beginning then chloe will not get a look in.

it would have been gud to have seen more clark and chloe than that quick fling in season 1
but i think its a bit late now cos we know clark will eventually end up wi her cousin Lois. If clark had chloe, lana and lois all on the go all at the same time it might get a bit much!

Not even Clark with all his powers could handle 3 women at once. If Lana learns his secret, then Clark will have to choose between his best freind and the woman he still loves. However, if Lana does marry Lex then it looks like we could see something happen between Clark and Chloe after all.

Unless of course chloe ends up with Jimmy again, cos hes gunna be sticking around. I hope we see clark and chloe, it would be something a bit new, instead of things going round and round - and they just suit!

Thank you jonny for your words of sanity.