Logo, click to go to Fantasy Football site
    C4 Forums    Sport    Fantasy Football    Scott Parker had intent!
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
One Gold Star
Posted
I was so pleased when the news was Bullard would only be out for 6-8 weeks with a dislocated knee and nothing else.
However it turns out Jimmy Bullard is out for 9 months with cruciate ligament damage and that is his season over.

I can't believe Jimmy will miss the rest of the season all because of a wreckless challenge from Parker. At first I thought that it was just a football incident but having seen it on numerous occasions I now think that Parker intentionally tried to hurt him. The tears were tears of guilt. This is a disgrace and I hope he gets what is coming to him. Vermin.

The match was evenly balanced before Jimmy went off- Parker and Bullard the players taking control for their teams. Parker obviously thought he would put a stop to this and decided to give him an advantage in their 'battle'.
Also Bullard is competing for the same England place as Parker is, another reason to get one over Bullard.

This is the same Parker that got sent off against us last season and also in the other game did a two footed tackle. The man is a thug.

Without Bullard I fear what may happen to us, Jimmy was our main drive, our inspiration, our creativity- earning us 4 points single handedly already this season. No doubt the comeback against newcastle was partly because the players were determined to do it for Jimmy.

It is even more gutting when you think it could only be a matter of time before he would have got into the England squad- better than Jenas, Parker, Nolan and other players challenging for a place in his position. Bullard is our Lampard and infact is just as good as him!

We have lost an important player and I fear where this may lead us.

Parker is a disgrace.
 
Posts: 7244Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Two Gold Stars
Posted Hide Post
Parker had intent lol ( wake up ) , he was in tears because there friends off the pitch and it was clear there was no intent in the tackle , it was a simple acciedent.
 
Posts: 1224Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
One Gold Star
Posted Hide Post
Hmmmm I only saw the highlights but no way did it look intentional to me.


Devil *14th April 1999 Villa Park* Devil
 
Posts: 635Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
One Gold Star
Posted Hide Post
No you wake up! Parker is a known dirty player who goes well over the top in some tackles.
He was in tears because he felt so guilty, he didn't intend to end his season, but he did want to hurt him.

It is there for everyone to see! Parker is falling and all of a sudden he changes direction to make sure he fall onto Bullards outstretched leg.
 
Posts: 7244Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
One Gold Star
Posted Hide Post
I'm not arguing/disagreeing with you, I only saw it the once and am unlikely to see it again.
Just gave my oppinion on what I saw.


Devil *14th April 1999 Villa Park* Devil
 
Posts: 635Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
One Gold Star
Posted Hide Post
was talking to Scorpion but you should try and view it again.

You tube has it
 
Posts: 7244Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Four Gold Stars
Picture of martl_2001
Posted Hide Post
I agree that it was Bullard's season to be introduced to the England squad. He is one of the best English midfielders.

I disagree that Parker intentionally injured him.


========================================================================

Kent Brockman: Roads closed, pipes frozen, albinos virtually invisible.
 
Posts: 2579Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
One Gold Star
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Sir Light, Sticks:
You tube has it

Just seen it on *******. Seems you're on your own here, mate. Parker isn't a malicious player and never has been. Are you bitter towards an old boy of yours?


************************************************************************

Ninian Park, 1909 - 2010. End of an era
 
Posts: 7261Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
One Gold Star
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by AndyCardiff:
quote:
Originally posted by Sir Light, Sticks:
You tube has it

Just seen it on you tube. Seems you're on your own here, mate. Parker isn't a malicious player and never has been. Are you bitter towards an old boy of yours?

Sorry, just read on another thread you're a Fulham fan. But I still think you're wrong about Parker


************************************************************************

Ninian Park, 1909 - 2010. End of an era
 
Posts: 7261Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Two Gold Stars
Posted Hide Post
He is only saying it was intent because he is a fulham fan.
If it was a chelsea player parker did it 2 he would not say anything about it.

think u should watch roy keane on haaland to c what intent looks like
 
Posts: 1224Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Two Gold Stars
Posted Hide Post
And u should watch the tackle again because parker clears the ball and bullard goes in2 parker , so not really a tackle
 
Posts: 1224Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Two Gold Stars
Posted Hide Post
complete accident, and parker has never to my knowledge been considered dirty.


COYS
 
Posts: 1433Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Four Gold Stars
Picture of martl_2001
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Scorpion:
think u should watch roy keane on haaland to c what intent looks like


Damn right! That was shameful.

I respect Parker as a hard-working, honest player.


========================================================================

Kent Brockman: Roads closed, pipes frozen, albinos virtually invisible.
 
Posts: 2579Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
One Gold Star
Posted Hide Post
Parker has always been a dirty player with over-the-top tackles.

Obviously he didn't want to put him out for the season but Parker wanted to shake him up a bit in an attempt to win the midfield battle. This back fired on him and his reaction was that of a man in regret.

I guess we have to agree to disagree though
 
Posts: 7244Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Two Gold Stars
Posted Hide Post
Agree 2 disagree did u watch it, all he did was clear the ball and his momentom took him in2 bullard and his leg got caught under parkers legs , thats it , no intent
 
Posts: 1224Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
One Gold Star
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Sir Light, Sticks:
Parker has always been a dirty player with over-the-top tackles.

Obviously he didn't want to put him out for the season but Parker wanted to shake him up a bit in an attempt to win the midfield battle. This back fired on him and his reaction was that of a man in regret.

I guess we have to agree to disagree though

Nonsense, this sort of 50-50 tackle goes on all the time, it was just unfortunate that this one resulted in that injury to Bullard. Parker was completely shaken up that a fellow pro was injured in the incident and was uncertain to the extent of the injury, as it looked pretty bad.

And has anyone noticed that the worst injuries (Keane apart) result from innocuous challenges. David Busst springs to mind, and there are more. Players learn to ride and to see dirty, career finishers early, I think.

By the way, what football do you watch? Is it the English League? Are you aware of Scott Parker? One of the best players not currently in the England squad.


************************************************************************

Ninian Park, 1909 - 2010. End of an era
 
Posts: 7261Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
One Gold Star
Posted Hide Post
I have viewed the incident numerous times.

I watch the English League and MLS, of course I am aware of Scott Parker, he is better than the likes of Jenas and the over-rated Carrick who are currently in the England squad.

I never doubted his talent, I just said there is a nasty streak to his game, I have seen it a few times at games I have been to.

His behaviour at Charlton when Chelsea came in for him was also a disgrace
 
Posts: 7244Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
One Gold Star
Posted Hide Post
Competitive yes, dirty no


************************************************************************

Ninian Park, 1909 - 2010. End of an era
 
Posts: 7261Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
One Gold Star
Posted Hide Post
Bullard was winning that midfield battle in Newcastle and only after he was brutally injured by Parker's wreckless charge, did Parker start to dominate the match.

Parker played like a demented demon against us - the same as last season when he was sent off. He committed a two-footed lunge inside the first minute only to scream at the official.

Parker deserves the reputation as a "dirty" player and it was no coincidence a "dirty" player was to blame for Bullard's injury. Had it been a player with a "clean" reputation, then this so-called "accident" would be easier to believe.

He didn't mean to injure Bullard as much as he did, hence the remorse

Scott Parker DESTROYED Jimmy Bullard's career possibly when you see Parker in an England shirt think how the challenge helped HIM get above Jimmy in the only way he knows how, by sheer unadulterated thuggery!
 
Posts: 7244Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Two Gold Stars
Posted Hide Post
and that comes from sum1 who knows nothing about intent ( look it up )and i guess has never played football.
 
Posts: 1224Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Three Gold Stars
Posted Hide Post
What an idiot, Parker's reaction to the injury wasn't exactly a snide snigger with a facial expression of YES JOB DONE!


Darnell Fan Club Member No.94.
 
Posts: 2140Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
One Gold Star
Posted Hide Post
No you are the idiot!
Parkers reaction to the injury was a look of remorse. He meant to hurt him but his face was full of guilt when he had seen what he had done.

I know what intent means without the need for a dictionary. You do not need to have played football do recognise that Parker is a thug.
 
Posts: 7244Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Two Gold Stars
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Sir Light, Sticks:
No you are the idiot!
Parkers reaction to the injury was a look of remorse. He meant to hurt him but his face was full of guilt when he had seen what he had done.

I know what intent means without the need for a dictionary. You do not need to have played football do recognise that Parker is a thug.


So his face was full of guilt? doesnt mean that he meant to hurt Bullard. Anyone would have felt guilty in that situation.
 
Posts: 1291Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
One Gold Star
Posted Hide Post
Sir Light, Sticks. You really have no idea what you are talking about on this, and I'm beginning to wonder if you've ever seen a game on TV or ever set foot in a ground. What you have said is absolute nonsense and not fit for a forum where sensible, common sense opinions are aired.

Go away, watch the incident carefully and without any bias, and come back with a proper answer. Idiot


************************************************************************

Ninian Park, 1909 - 2010. End of an era
 
Posts: 7261Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
One Gold Star
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by AndyCardiff:
Sir Light, Sticks. You really have no idea what you are talking about on this, and I'm beginning to wonder if you've ever seen a game on TV or ever set foot in a ground. What you have said is absolute nonsense and not fit for a forum where sensible, common sense opinions are aired.

Go away, watch the incident carefully and without any bias, and come back with a proper answer. Idiot


haha good job I'm here to stay then Smile
I have a season ticket and have been to over 200 games.
I have seen the incident numerous of times, at first I thought it was accidental however I have looked at it from a number of different angles and changed my opinion.
When I thought it was accidental I listened to what others had to say, unlike you who is obviously a vile pathetic excuse for a forumer if they cannot accept opinions.

You do not know for fact that Parker did not mean it any more than I know he did mean it. Only Parker himself knows and I was just bringing up the possibility (strong one imo) that there was intent.

Think on!
 
Posts: 7244Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 2