Question:
For Chelsea they are immense, but for England they were sunday leaugue. What a couple of bottle mercahnts.

Choices:
Terry was worst?
Lampard was worst?
I am talking rubbish?

 

Lampard had a BAD tournament. But Terry was brilliant along with Ferdinand.

quote:

Originally posted by zeds:
Lampard had a BAD tournament. But Terry was brilliant along with Ferdinand.

they were both awful, lampard was worse though as he had around 30shots and converted 0. I've been saying how overated he is for the last 2-3 years but no one's listened to me, and now some people are finally waking up, but the vast majority still think he's world class but just had a bad tournament, how deluded people be?

quote:

Originally posted by PillyPumpPie vs WillyWumpWhy:

quote:

Originally posted by zeds:
Lampard had a BAD tournament. But Terry was brilliant along with Ferdinand.

they were both awful, lampard was worse though as he had around 30shots and converted 0. I've been saying how overated he is for the last 2-3 years but no one's listened to me, and now some people are finally waking up, but the vast majority still think he's world class but just had a bad tournament, how deluded people be?

I mean't 'how deluded can people be'?

quote:

Originally posted by PillyPumpPie vs WillyWumpWhy:

quote:

Originally posted by PillyPumpPie vs WillyWumpWhy:

quote:

Originally posted by zeds:
Lampard had a BAD tournament. But Terry was brilliant along with Ferdinand.

they were both awful, lampard was worse though as he had around 30shots and converted 0. I've been saying how overated he is for the last 2-3 years but no one's listened to me, and now some people are finally waking up, but the vast majority still think he's world class but just had a bad tournament, how deluded people be?

I mean't 'how deluded can people be'?

I would normally say that Lampard is pretty okay... but lacked something this tournament... you wold have thought that he could have put at least one away!!! But well he got to be on the pitch because of his name, not his skill.. thats all the manager saw and refused to take him off to replace him with a less known name and look what happend.

lampard had a terrible tournement this year, terry did well

the only thing i can give lumpard gredit for is having the bottle to step up for a pen, but he was in a no win situation. overall its the managers fault for not replacing a player who was so off form, terry did ok , nothing special , and joe cole did well but was wasted and should have stayed on as he can score and create chances.

Lampard scored the most goals in the qualifiers...... he did have a awful WC tho, Thort Terry played well wiv Rio... and no i aint a chelsea fan... my hubby is and even he says the lamps was dreadful... for chelsea last season he had about 40 odd shots on goal and scored about 16 times.. (rough estimates, i dont listen to my hubby THAT much).. if it was a Chelsea shirt on his back, me finks he wud av scored a few!!!

Lampard was awful. He couldn't hit a cow's ass with a banjo in front of goal and his passing from midfield was very poor. His penalty miss was the icing on the cake.

John Terry on the other hand was excellent. England's defensive record speaks for itself.

quote:

Originally posted by slapmatt:
Lampard was awful. He couldn't hit a cow's ass with a banjo in front of goal and his passing from midfield was very poor. His penalty miss was the icing on the cake.

John Terry on the other hand was excellent. England's defensive record speaks for itself.

then why are so many people having a pop at robinson ? terry was at fault for one of the two goals conceded and almost set up and ecuador goal. terry done ok but made some big mistakes and has got away with it.