C4 Forums    Life    Green    carbon footprint and solution to global warming
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
New Member
Posted
carbon footprint
The carbon footprint is equal to the salary everyone has ....the higher the salary the larger the footprint.
In business,the footprint is as large as its expenditure.
the solution
The global solution is to have static world growth
financially,combined with static population growth
globally.
This however does not mean that some areas of the world can grow but this must be done by others becoming wiser and skillful in reducing there footprints.
 
Posts: 1Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
all well and good to say that from a country that has been through the majority of its economic and social development, what right do the west have to dictate what people in the 3rd world can do? what right do we have to stunt their development?
 
Posts: 5Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Three Silver Stars
Posted Hide Post
Actually in the UK, we need a dramatic reduction in population density if we were going to depend wholly on the UK land mass for survival.

Probably down to 20 million or less.
 
Posts: 137Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
One Silver Star
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by solargain:
Actually in the UK, we need a dramatic reduction in population density if we were going to depend wholly on the UK land mass for survival.

Probably down to 20 million or less.


Problem is, the UK economy probably wouldn't be able to survive on 20 mill... which is the conundrum we face Frown
 
Posts: 22Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
I don't think that our income HAS to be linked to our ecological footprint in that way.

The majority of our footprint comes from the burning of fossil fuels, so if we can move to renewables I don't see a reason why income can't continue to rise, and our footprints fall.
 
Posts: 4Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Three Silver Stars
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by vxpert:
quote:
Originally posted by solargain:
Actually in the UK, we need a dramatic reduction in population density if we were going to depend wholly on the UK land mass for survival.

Probably down to 20 million or less.


Problem is, the UK economy probably wouldn't be able to survive on 20 mill... which is the conundrum we face Frown


It would survive, but not as it is now.
 
Posts: 137Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Three Silver Stars
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by importantrecycling:
all well and good to say that from a country that has been through the majority of its economic and social development, what right do the west have to dictate what people in the 3rd world can do? what right do we have to stunt their development?


OK, well we know we have made big mistakes and need to change, so surely a developing nation shouldn't be making the same mistake?
If we want them to stop, aren't we doing them a favour?
 
Posts: 137Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Four Silver Stars
Picture of Toolz
Posted Hide Post
I dont like all this carbon footprint and dont believe in the effects of carbon but i think those who do believe it and are rich can easily afford to pay for all the equipment needed to make their own carbon footprint less than nothing.
 
Posts: 528Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Three Silver Stars
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Toolz:
I dont like all this carbon footprint


Why?



quote:
Originally posted by Toolz:
and dont believe in the effects of carbon


Why?
 
Posts: 137Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Four Silver Stars
Picture of Toolz
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by solargain:
Why?


Because there is no proof. The planet will get warmer if we didnt exist at all. Thats how the planet works and making predictions that the planet will get warmer because of the carbon we produce is not proof of anything. If I say the carbon we produce makes the sun rise tomorrow then it dont make it anymore true when the sun rises.

The sad thing is if the planet was on the way back to the next ice age getting colder then they could still use an argument that its us doing it.

The planet uses carbon to survive its as important as water. We are created from it. We breath it out. Plants breath it in. Why do we need to fight against global warming anyway? The nature of our planet is to change we cant force it to stop and obey us so we can live more comfortable lives without harsh weather i think that is not natural.
 
Posts: 528Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Three Silver Stars
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Toolz:
quote:
Originally posted by solargain:
Why?


Because there is no proof.


Well that is incorrect isn't it. A large consensus of scientists agree that we are causing a problem. The number is also growing.
What reference can you give to say that there is no proof?.


quote:
Originally posted by Toolz:
The planet will get warmer if we didnt exist at all.


With in certain parameters the climate would change, that variation is included in the science that shows we are causing a problem.


quote:
Originally posted by Toolz:
Thats how the planet works and making predictions that the planet will get warmer because of the carbon we produce is not proof of anything.


Well, by you saying the earth works in a certain way isn't proof of anything, you need to present your evidence.

quote:
Originally posted by Toolz:
If I say the carbon we produce makes the sun rise tomorrow then it dont make it anymore true when the sun rises.


Your statement doesn't fit any experimental or observable event, so it would be rejected by scientific peer review.



quote:
Originally posted by Toolz:
The planet uses carbon to survive its as important as water.


Carbon is just one aspect of the planet and it exists in different places and in different forms. The simplicity of your statement would be fine if the planet had no life on it that depended on the current eco-system balance.
You are also ignoring the timeline/history and the balance that existed in the past as opposed to the balance now.


quote:
Originally posted by Toolz:
We are created from it.


With the normal energy levels on earth, carbon can not be created or destroyed. It is an element, it can only be created and destroyed in the extremes of the universe, such as stars etc.

quote:
Originally posted by Toolz:
We breath it out.


We do breathe it out, but it first it has to be taken in via food and drink. By burning fossil fuels which hold stored solar energy from millions of years ago when the eco system was different, we are adding new carbon to the current eco-system. This would be fine if we planted huge forests that would have existed millions of years ago and knocked down our cities. But we aren't doing that, so this carbon form the past is sitting in our eco-system with nothing to do other than warming the climate.


quote:
Originally posted by Toolz:
Plants breath it in.


To be a little more accurate plants will use it when the sun is out, basically using solar energy to grow. The carbon is then stored in their structure, until the plant dies, is eaten or is burnt. Then the carbon is returned to the atmosphere again.
This is fine since it is just a cycle and doesn't increase the amount of carbon in the eco-system.

quote:
Originally posted by Toolz:
Why do we need to fight against global warming anyway? The nature of our planet is to change we cant force it to stop and obey us so we can live more comfortable lives without harsh weather i think that is not natural.


We can change the impact we have on the planet, external events are not our business, we have responsibility for the damage we do and that is what we need to focus on.
 
Posts: 137Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by solargain:
quote:
Originally posted by importantrecycling:
all well and good to say that from a country that has been through the majority of its economic and social development, what right do the west have to dictate what people in the 3rd world can do? what right do we have to stunt their development?


in a theoretical point of view your statement is fine but thats not how it works in the real world, we arent offering this technology to developing nations and they are burning the most polluting power which is wood

OK, well we know we have made big mistakes and need to change, so surely a developing nation shouldn't be making the same mistake?
If we want them to stop, aren't we doing them a favour?
 
Posts: 5Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Two Silver Stars
Posted Hide Post
I think everyone is getting bogged down in the wrong issue....


surely the only thing we need to agree on and do something about is that it is wrong to pollute our environment, and we must stop.
 
Posts: 50Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 

    C4 Forums    Life    Green    carbon footprint and solution to global warming