I wouldn't have minded who won actually, their food was all of a high standard.
With the new short format though, we don't tend to see their hosting skills so much, nor strangely do the other guests tend to comment much on it (apart from small niggles like paper napkins).
Again, I would have liked to get to know the guests better and see them doing more of the cooking and the guests nosying around the house.
*It is not necessary to understand things in order to argue about them. -- Pierre De Beaumarchais
One of the best ones of the series so far imo. If it had been me, I would have voted for Suzanne the firt host as being the best but I wasn't too disappointed that Hazel won. The youngest guy was a little sweetie. So polite and well mannered and his meal was really good. I agree the food was all of a high standard this week and the guests were all interesting, a really good mix. Was a bit wary of Chris at first but when he cooked the second night it was, although an odd mix, all good stuff and his artwork was fantastic. Shame we didn't get to know more about his work and how he came to be doing it, this is where this new format loses out I think. Still I enjoyed this one.
"Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain - and most fools do" Benjamin Franklin "Some cause happiness wherever they go - others whenever they go" Oscar Wilde
i didnt like the small bloke who cooked frogs legs on the second night. i think it was disgusting what he said when they were picking letters out the bag! i'd of slapped him. ewwwww
they stole my sig, my lovely sig!!!! Jack&Kate belong - Jate!
I think Chris was great! Without him the whole thing could have turned very dull. It must have been edited quite a bit so it's hard to tell what they were really like on balance.