History logo, Click to Return to Homepage
    C4 Forums    History    History    No Lurker, it's Not Blackcentric: It's the truth!
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
New Member
Posted
Lurker – the gist of your post suggests that you are White, however your propensity for popping off about something that you apparently know nothing about, is unfortunately very – well never mind.

In any case, you have reacted the way any White person with a normal education would, and indeed, most any Black person period, regardless of educational level, (that is sorry indeed, but unfortunately most Blacks don’t like to read, especially this sort of thing).

I have often pondered why that is, I have never figured it out, but it may have to do with the expectation that the material will be racistly skewed. Which of course it is, but with good background material, it’s not too hard to figure out. I have found that one of the best pieces of background material to have, is the timeframe of evolution of early man, along with the timeframe of Caucasian and Mongol migration from the Eurasian plains (1500-2000 B.C.). Once you have that, it’s hard to fool you.

By the way, the book “Not out of Africa” was written by a Jewish woman named Mary Lefkowitz. That a Jewish person would write such a book should come as no surprise to anyone that knows history. These Europeans calling themselves Jews, are actually ethnic Turks from the old kingdom of Khazaria, (just south of the Caucasus Mountains), who after converting to Judaism, and with the demise of the Hebrews in Canaan, have spent the last thousand years going all over the world telling everyone that they are Jews, but to their credit, they rarely say that they are HEBREWS.

However, I cannot give the same credit to the Turks who run around calling themselves Arabs, Egyptians, Libyans, Berbers, etc. etc. They have no shame. After stealing Black peoples land, they then stole the Black peoples identity. It’s very much the same as in America, where many Indian tribes – through crossbreeding, are pure White, yet they want to call themselves Indian. Back to the Arabs: did anyone really think that people who need to cover themselves from head to toe, in order to survive the Sun, could really have originated in the deserts of Arabia? Get real! IT'S ALL IN THE BOOK.


So Lurker, let’s do this:
1) You read the on-line book (keeping careful written notes of the things that you feel are not true.
2) You invest in a current and up-to-date encyclopedia. Then you look those things up.
3) Come back to the forum with the things that you could not reconcile. I will help you.

As an aside: you know Lurker, I have often wondered, during my own many years of research. If those racist pieces of s—t writing that crap, ever considered what they were doing to White children like yourself, (no offense – I’m old).

By that I mean, how are you going to feel about yourself, and White people in general when you find out the truth? This is only a guess on my part, but I don’t think that it will be a pleasant experience.

By the way, the authors of the book included many original pictures to make their point, if you wish to dispute the pictures, I will direct you to the Museum where the artifact resides. If there is anything else that I can do to help you, please let me know.
Looking forward to hearing from you, after you have read the book.
 
Posts: 17Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Four Gold Stars
Picture of Greenjack
Posted Hide Post
Just out of interest, what colour do you suppose "mitichondrial eve" may have been, in view of the theory that we all are probably descended from her.
Not that it really bothers me, but if this is the case she could have been any one of the many colours we have today, even though she is said to come from africa.


Cheers
GJ
 
Posts: 2404Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
Geeze - I can't believe you wrote that. Doesn't anybody read anymore? In the last several years a few things have been established that nobody but religious looneys argue.

1) Homo-sapiens (modern Mankind) originated in southern Africa.

2) Caucasians and Mongols (Whites and Yellows) evolved from Cro-Magnons who had migrated north to the Eurasian plains some 120,000 years ago. Whites and Mongols separated appx. 40,000 years ago.

How they became White and Yellow is still debated, but is believed to involve Neanderthal, who was the first White Humanoid and the first Humanoid to inhabit the northern areas.

The Eurasian plains extend from about the Caspian Sea to Manchuria in eastern China.
So you see, White people are NOT from Europe!
Get a good book and read it, or go to this website: [URL=http://www.realhistoryww.com]
Hope I have helped you.
 
Posts: 17Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Two Silver Stars
Posted Hide Post
quote:
1) Homo-sapiens (modern Mankind) originated in southern Africa.

2) Caucasians and Mongols (Whites and Yellows) evolved from Cro-Magnons who had migrated north to the Eurasian plains some 120,000 years ago. Whites and Mongols separated appx. 40,000 years ago.

Racist gibberish ! Please see note 2 in the following university article: University of Botswana

I am very aware that we all came from Africa - though I thought it was from east Africa (apparently it's NORTH-east Africa - rift valley I think).

You're the one trying to say that certain early cultures were in fact originated strictly by sub-saharan people ("Black") as opposed to the actual inhabitants of the land in question: Chinese, Indian, etc.
 
Posts: 4200Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
One Gold Star
Posted Hide Post
quote:
How they became White and Yellow is still debated, but is believed to involve Neanderthal, who was the first White Humanoid and the first Humanoid to inhabit the northern areas.



Are you suggesting Neanderthal was an evolutionary step in the development of homo sapiens? I thought that had been discarded many years ago.
 
Posts: 620Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Four Gold Stars
Picture of Greenjack
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by passingthru:
Geeze - I can't believe you wrote that. Doesn't anybody read anymore?he he, those that know me also know I am never without a book. Where dou you think I got the info' ? Roll Eyes In the last several years a few things have been established that nobody but religious looneys argue.I'm not religious. I might be a bit loony though Moon (I said loony not moony)

1) Homo-sapiens (modern Mankind) originated in southern Africa.e.g. mitochondrial eve !

2) Caucasians and Mongols (Whites and Yellows) evolved from Cro-Magnons who had migrated north to the Eurasian plains some 120,000 years ago. Whites and Mongols separated appx. 40,000 years ago. I thought whites originated in africa ? Confused

How they became White and Yellow is still debated, but is believed to involve Neanderthal, who was the first White Humanoid and the first Humanoid to inhabit the northern areas.

The Eurasian plains extend from about the Caspian Sea to Manchuria in eastern China.
So you see, White people are NOT from Europe!
Get a good book and read it, or go to this website: [URL=http://www.realhistoryww.com]
Hope I have helped you.
You have confused me. It's just as well you are only passingthru Wink


Cheers
GJ
 
Posts: 2404Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Two Silver Stars
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by passingthru:


By the way, the book “Not out of Africa” was written by a Jewish woman named Mary Lefkowitz. That a Jewish person would write such a book should come as no surprise to anyone that knows history. These Europeans calling themselves Jews, are actually ethnic Turks from the old kingdom of Khazaria, (just south of the Caucasus Mountains), who after converting to Judaism, and with the demise of the Hebrews in Canaan, have spent the last thousand years going all over the world telling everyone that they are Jews, but to their credit, they rarely say that they are HEBREWS.

.


On the contrary most Jews are descended from the original middle eastern population. The non-Jewish populations with the most genetically in common with the Jews are the Arabs including Palistinians, Syrians and Lebanese.

See below link
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/742430.stm
 
Posts: 56Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
Sunnyblink - Please take the time to read more carefully. "Those most genetically in common with the Jews are the Arabs including Palistinians, Syrians and Lebanese"

Da - isn't that pretty-much what I said. To that you can add - Libyans, Egyptians, Iraqis, Iranians(mostly), Turks of Turkey, etc. etc.

They all have one thing in common - THEY ARE ALL ETHNICALLY "TURKS". They all arrived in the middle-east in the 2nd. century A.D. THEY ARE NOT ORIGINAL INHABITANTS!!!!!
 
Posts: 17Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Two Silver Stars
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by passingthru:
Sunnyblink - Please take the time to read more carefully. "Those most genetically in common with the Jews are the Arabs including Palistinians, Syrians and Lebanese"

Da - isn't that pretty-much what I said. To that you can add - Libyans, Egyptians, Iraqis, Iranians(mostly), Turks of Turkey, etc. etc.

They all have one thing in common - THEY ARE ALL ETHNICALLY "TURKS". They all arrived in the middle-east in the 2nd. century A.D. THEY ARE NOT ORIGINAL INHABITANTS!!!!!


The same survey also shows that the vast majority of Jews, with the notable exception of Ethiopians, are genetically the same people.

The great bulk of Jews ARE descended from the inhabitants of Israel 2000 years ago which is why they are closely related to Palistinians, Syrians etc.

The Turks arrived in the middle east much later than 200 AD, the Turks weren't in the middle east in large numbers until after the Battle of Manikert in 1071
 
Posts: 56Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
Geez Sunnyblink, you are being unnecessarily difficult.

First, please do me the favor of consulting any encyclopedia Book or on-line and look up “TURK” then look up Khazar.

But just as a matter of common sense, do you really think That “White” people could have really evolved in the middle-east?
Or anywhere near it for that matter, do you really?

The answer is of course no, but I think that your confusion stems from the Arabs, because so many – almost all – of these people call themselves Arabs. Another question: Do you really thing that people who need to
Cover themselves from head to toe, in order to survive the Sun could Possibly have evolved in the middle-east – of course not. (What would
They have done, before they learned to make clothing?)

Another question: do you really think that the sparsely populated Deserts of Arabia could have given birth to all those people who Call themselves Arab? Nope, it’s those pesky Turks again, one Group of them (the Khazars) usurped and assumed the identity of the Hebrews, Another usurped and assumed the identity of the Arabs. I’m not sure, but I think this last part was consummated when the Ottomans sent in a detachment of Albanians (also Turks)
to put down an uprising of real Arabs in 1811.

Here is a question that I haven’t figured an answer to: WHY – Why would a group of people be content to take on the identity of another group of people with which they have nothing in common – not even the same race? It is Particularly galling to me, to see all those Turks calling themselves Egyptians.
If you ever figure it out, please let me know.

The full story is here: http://www.realhistoryww.com
Do yourself a favor, READ IT!
 
Posts: 17Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 

    C4 Forums    History    History    No Lurker, it's Not Blackcentric: It's the truth!