C4 Forums    Talk4    The TV Show    ITV's Ofcom fine - Is it fair? Is it enough? What do YOU think?
Page 1 2 3 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Web Producer
Posted
ITV has been fined a record £5.68m by Ofcom for its abuse of premium rate phone competitions. The network has also been ordered to broadcast a summary of Ofcom's findings on six separate occasions.

Last year a report found that viewers of programmes including Ant and Dec's Saturday Night Takeaway and Soapstar Superstar, had spent millions on unfair competitions.

So, what do you think of the fine? Is it fair? Is it enough? Should anyone at ITV have been held personally accountable? And will you ever trust TV phone-ins again? We’d love to hear your thoughts…

The TV Show will be filmed this Saturday (May 10) in London – if you’d like to take part in a live debate on this issue* please email thetvshow@princessTV.com

See The TV Show website for more information.

Thanks

*Please be aware, a debate on this topic is not yet confirmed, but if you'd be interested to contribute to the discussion, The TV Show would love to hear from you
 
Posts: 163Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Two Gold Stars
Posted Hide Post
C4 would never do such a thing. Ninja


I am totally the Deebsie Mad
 
Posts: 1151Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
One Gold Star
Picture of Mr Woolf
Posted Hide Post
If we, as individuals, perpetrated such a scam, we would expect to spend years in the slammer.
These guys have received barely a slap on the wrist: A percent or so of annual profit?

It's no worse than a speeding fine.

String 'em up, I say.


What time is it, Mr Woolf?
Time to mend your ways, for the end is nigh.
 
Posts: 600Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Two Silver Stars
Picture of the rationalist
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Deebsie:
C4 would never do such a thing. Ninja


Yours sincerely

Richard, Judy and Noel.
 
Posts: 122Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
One Silver Star
Posted Hide Post
Where does the £5,680,000 go to?

Such a lot of money - let me guess - Ofcom get to keep it Wink

They are not cheap these Ofcom directors - we are talking REALLY silly money here folks.
 
Posts: 10862Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Four Gold Stars
Picture of wolfram
Posted Hide Post
What does C4 care what anybody thinks about anything?

Once there were forums where debate was possible - about news, politics and the like. They now resemble ruins with tumbleweeds rolling around in a foul smelling breeze.

It remains unclear, due to a complete inability on the administration's part to communicate on the issue, whether this is an unfortunate but inevitable occurrence or, and I suspect this is the more likely, that it is the result of frankly poor management and individuals combining their employment with some sort of perverse "sport".

Either way it's a damned shame.
 
Posts: 2370Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
One Silver Star
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by wolfram:
What does C4 care what anybody thinks about anything?

Once there were forums where debate was possible - about news, politics and the like. They now resemble ruins with tumbleweeds rolling around in a foul smelling breeze.

It remains unclear, due to a complete inability on the administration's part to communicate on the issue, whether this is an unfortunate but inevitable occurrence or, and I suspect this is the more likely, that it is the result of frankly poor management and individuals combining their employment with some sort of perverse "sport".

Either way it's a damned shame.


Seconded.
 
Posts: 10965Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
One Gold Star
Posted Hide Post
Behind the facade of corporate responsibility the decision to do this must've been taken by some individual (or individuals) and approved by others. Surely they should be identified and punished too.

The same applies to the BBC and the £106,000 they stole from charity.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/7392213.stm
 
Posts: 7004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
They deserved more FAR MORE; This was nothing more than sheer delibrate greed and deception (RE ant and dec- how could a vewiwer in scotland ever get to the giggy bank in London before the end of the programme- a delibrate Con!)
the fine is partilly refelective of the call costs, does Not take into account the Real PROFITS made from each programme (ie advertising reveue).
They should be fined a huge percentage of that too, otherwise they have effectivly been fined NILL;
Note the process to 'reclaim' your call costs (sending in an itemised phone bill!!) actualy makes a mockery of the whole OFCOM sham.
They should be hit Very HArd, this isnt even the first offence!!
Broadcasting Standards where? if anyone else pulled this scam, they would be in jail.
 
Posts: 6Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
One Silver Star
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Anonimouse:
quote:
Originally posted by wolfram:
What does C4 care what anybody thinks about anything?

Once there were forums where debate was possible - about news, politics and the like. They now resemble ruins with tumbleweeds rolling around in a foul smelling breeze.

It remains unclear, due to a complete inability on the administration's part to communicate on the issue, whether this is an unfortunate but inevitable occurrence or, and I suspect this is the more likely, that it is the result of frankly poor management and individuals combining their employment with some sort of perverse "sport".

Either way it's a damned shame.


Seconded.


Thirded, the same goes for the wider process, so-called democracy and the "due process" which is just as weighted against the less than equal.
 
Posts: 3116Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
C4 Viewers' Editor
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by wolfram:
What does C4 care what anybody thinks about anything?

Once there were forums where debate was possible - about news, politics and the like. They now resemble ruins with tumbleweeds rolling around in a foul smelling breeze.

It remains unclear, due to a complete inability on the administration's part to communicate on the issue, whether this is an unfortunate but inevitable occurrence or, and I suspect this is the more likely, that it is the result of frankly poor management and individuals combining their employment with some sort of perverse "sport".

Either way it's a damned shame.


Ouch! As Viewers’ Editor, I care a great deal about what viewers think of Channel 4 and its programmes. We welcome comment on anything we do, and our forums are here to facilitate debate. Any criticisms posted on here are read, and I ask the Commissioning Editors and production companies to join in on any forum debates that spring from the programmes they have made. I’ll also ask them to reply directly to any criticisms posted on The TV Show website. All comments sent to our Viewer Enquiries address get copied to the senior managers and the Heads of all the Channels, as well as a summary of what people are discussing on our forums. I am very open to suggestions for how we could do better, so please don’t hold back!
 
Posts: 59Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
One Silver Star
Picture of polspe
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Paula C4:
quote:
Originally posted by wolfram:
What does C4 care what anybody thinks about anything?

Once there were forums where debate was possible - about news, politics and the like. They now resemble ruins with tumbleweeds rolling around in a foul smelling breeze.

It remains unclear, due to a complete inability on the administration's part to communicate on the issue, whether this is an unfortunate but inevitable occurrence or, and I suspect this is the more likely, that it is the result of frankly poor management and individuals combining their employment with some sort of perverse "sport".

Either way it's a damned shame.


Ouch! As Viewers’ Editor, I care a great deal about what viewers think of Channel 4 and its programmes. We welcome comment on anything we do, and our forums are here to facilitate debate. Any criticisms posted on here are read, and I ask the Commissioning Editors and production companies to join in on any forum debates that spring from the programmes they have made. I’ll also ask them to reply directly to any criticisms posted on The TV Show website. All comments sent to our Viewer Enquiries address get copied to the senior managers and the Heads of all the Channels, as well as a summary of what people are discussing on our forums. I am very open to suggestions for how we could do better, so please don’t hold back!


OK number 1 suggestion on how you could do better - Forums back to 24/7 write access with 24/7 mod cover.


LFC for the prem
 
Posts: 10221Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Four Gold Stars
Picture of wolfram
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Paula C4:



Ouch! As Viewers’ Editor, I care a great deal about what viewers think of Channel 4 and its programmes. We welcome comment on anything we do, and our forums are here to facilitate debate. Any criticisms posted on here are read, and I ask the Commissioning Editors and production companies to join in on any forum debates that spring from the programmes they have made. I’ll also ask them to reply directly to any criticisms posted on The TV Show website. All comments sent to our Viewer Enquiries address get copied to the senior managers and the Heads of all the Channels, as well as a summary of what people are discussing on our forums. I am very open to suggestions for how we could do better, so please don’t hold back!


Thanks for your prompt response Paula. I'll certainly have some thoughts over the weekend, as, I'm sure, will others.

I'm particularly grateful that what was a rant of frustration has, at last found constructive eyes even if the purpose of this thread is for something else. Could I suggest that for the News forum a start would be to cease the practice of deleting entire threads on the strength of one post being perceived as unsuitable.

Thanks again.
 
Posts: 2370Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
C4 Viewers' Editor
Posted Hide Post
Look forward to your futher thoughts Wolfram. I will have a chat to the mods about the deleted threads issue, as I think you make a valid point. I suspect the 24/7 opening suggested by Poslpe is a budget constraint, so may not be as easy to address

Paula
 
Posts: 59Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Two Gold Stars
Picture of free_thinker
Posted Hide Post
I have been posting here for years and had occasional posts deleted because they probably stepped over the 'robust' debate line.

Recently, I and others have had many posts deleted that could not in any way be considered objectionable. Even a post thanking for pointing out why a link didn't work was deleted.

When posts and threads that are deleted there is absolutely no explanation of what was wrong.
The mods exercise absolute and arbitrary justice with no explanation, justification or redress.
No you think this is appropriate and more importantly do you think it reflects the core values of C4?


Atheism - a non-prophet organisation
 
Posts: 1472Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
One Gold Star
Picture of fantasy and comedy are all my joy
Posted Hide Post
The fine should be more, they scammed the votes off peoples' money. That's just not right- it's illegal isn't it?
 
Posts: 655Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
One Silver Star
Picture of Veggieburger
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by wolfram:
What does C4 care what anybody thinks about anything?

Once there were forums where debate was possible - about news, politics and the like. They now resemble ruins with tumbleweeds rolling around in a foul smelling breeze.

It remains unclear, due to a complete inability on the administration's part to communicate on the issue, whether this is an unfortunate but inevitable occurrence or, and I suspect this is the more likely, that it is the result of frankly poor management and individuals combining their employment with some sort of perverse "sport".

Either way it's a damned shame.


Well said. Clapping

We as forum users are treated like children, users are banned with very little explanation, threads are pulled on the whim of whoever is the mod of the day, when you e mail them for an explanation 9 times out of 10 you just receive the standard reply back.

Yes, I could go somewhere else but why should Channel 4 be allowed to behave in this fashion, this from the channel that championed the alternative view on so many issues.

It's very disappointing




Open The Forum Up 24/7 Like It Used To Be. . . . .Please!
 
Posts: 11970Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Three Silver Stars
Picture of ok...
Posted Hide Post
I agree with you, the fine should be more and you should pay back the money witch you took from the inocent vievers
quote:
Originally posted by fantasy and comedy are all my joy:
The fine should be more, they scammed the votes off peoples' money. That's just not right- it's illegal isn't it?
 
Posts: 126Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
One Gold Star
Posted Hide Post
They should be fined and banned from running them for several years, after which they should have to pay around £5M before they can start running them again.
 
Posts: 6128Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Four Silver Stars
Picture of ScottTheDot
Posted Hide Post
They should be forced to broadcast 'Scallywagga' and 'Two pints of lager' at prime time.
 
Posts: 317Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Two Gold Stars
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Anonimouse:
quote:
Originally posted by wolfram:
What does C4 care what anybody thinks about anything?

Once there were forums where debate was possible - about news, politics and the like. They now resemble ruins with tumbleweeds rolling around in a foul smelling breeze.

It remains unclear, due to a complete inability on the administration's part to communicate on the issue, whether this is an unfortunate but inevitable occurrence or, and I suspect this is the more likely, that it is the result of frankly poor management and individuals combining their employment with some sort of perverse "sport".

Either way it's a damned shame.


Seconded.

So true. Roll Eyes
 
Posts: 8669Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
One Platinum StarOne Platinum Star
Picture of Marguerita
Posted Hide Post
I believe they got away with it lightly they should have been fined more ,I never do these phone in's anymore as I dont trust any of them ,and yes I think there are people at ITV who should be held personally accountable Ninja

Laugh
 
Posts: 54528Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Three Silver Stars
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Paula C4:
Ouch! As Viewers’ Editor, I care a great deal about what viewers think of Channel 4 and its programmes. We welcome comment on anything we do, and our forums are here to facilitate debate. Any criticisms posted on here are read, and I ask the Commissioning Editors and production companies to join in on any forum debates that spring from the programmes they have made.


What about when Mods delete posts and active threads with no notice or reason - Just how is that conducive to debate? It has happened on numerous occasions and if you query why your post/thread was deleted you just get some standard (and idiotic) reply that they cannot actually tell you because now that they have deleted it they cannot check.

If they decide to delete something then surely they know the reason why and could inform the poster so they don't make the same mistake again. Likewise if you are unsure (such as in potential copyright infringement issues) you could ask the poster about it. Mods on most decent fora manage to do this so why can the Mods here not do the same?


-----------------------------------

Never argue with stupid people. They just drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
 
Posts: 240Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Two Silver Stars
Picture of Mr Slippy