I find it hard to believe the banker would have offered 80 or 81K, what was the offer in Laura's game, anyone remember, I think it was about 57K, so why would Big Ron's have been higher with the 10p and 250K in play when again from memory Laura had 3K and 250K in play!

Someone remember!

Think Laura was offered 44,000

You're right, horseinhouse. I'm afraid it is another example of the banker offering more than he would had the contestant not dealt

quote:

Originally posted by Posh Paws:
You're right, horseinhouse. I'm afraid it is another example of the banker offering more than he would had the contestant not dealt

I agree totally with your comment above Posh Paws.

There's no way the banker plays on with honesty.

Very true

Its just a bit of rubbing their nose in it because they dealt too early, shows the banker is not an honest guy, someone should rub his nose in it!!!!

quote:

Originally posted by LINDY 44:
Think Laura was offered 44,000

heheheh, it was £45,000 ...maybe your reminded because of your username??
and I agree, the offer would have stuck really

In active play the offer would have gone up still, the amount can depend as much on the player and previous amounts they've turned down as it can on the remaining values on the board.

You are quite right about offers being higher in the proveout though, it kinda annoys me too (it's so the banker can claim some kind of victory from the game even if the contestant does sell their box for more than its worth).

In Big Ron's case, had he turned down the 5th offer of 31k, the banker would have had to put the 6th offer up significantly to make him deal - he probably wouldn't have been offered much less in active play I reckon.