We all know that the official story is complete la la land, but a new slant on this. Is this a Faction 2 attack ?
Bush was mind whipped that day, lets assume for one moment that he does know where and what his arse is for, who else could detonate the WTC complex ?
Faction 2 could. Maybe thats why the official story sucks, because they are covering up for another factions action, a faction they can't admit exists because it would make Faction 1 be a reality.
Originally posted by ann droid: Yeah, them buildings is still there if you look carefully, and them AQT are so nice you'd want your sweet doughta to marry one - yeah!
Like the CH4 story tonite - them sweet boys being held by them nasty yanks.
Maybe NOT!!!!
Hmmmm, lets leave personal agendas aside shall we n00b
Originally posted by sounditout: The answer is YES, we did get 9/11 all wrong, because we invaded Iraq whom had sfa to do with it...............
... whilst ignoring the COuntry which provided MOST OF the 9/11 hijackers, and which provided most of al Quaeda's funding, and of which Osama bin Laden was a Citizen.
Originally posted by sounditout: The answer is YES, we did get 9/11 all wrong, because we invaded Iraq whom had sfa to do with it...............
... whilst ignoring the COuntry which provided MOST OF the 9/11 hijackers, and which provided most of al Quaeda's funding, and of which Osama bin Laden was a Citizen.
'Why would we do that?'
Don't set me off again...
Who said Iraq is the end - more might be on the way.
Originally posted by sounditout: The answer is YES, we did get 9/11 all wrong, because we invaded Iraq whom had sfa to do with it...............
... whilst ignoring the COuntry which provided MOST OF the 9/11 hijackers, and which provided most of al Quaeda's funding, and of which Osama bin Laden was a Citizen.
'Why would we do that?'
Don't set me off again...
Who said Iraq is the end - more might be on the way.
North Korea and Iran are the biggest threats in the world and i can see Chinas aggressive posturing towards Taiwan becoming a problem
[QUOTE]Originally posted by ann droid: [QUOTE]Originally posted by Uttoxeter: [QUOTE]Originally posted by sounditout: The answer is YES, we did get 9/11 all wrong, because we invaded Iraq whom had sfa to do with it.
Originally posted by sounditout: The answer is YES, we did get 9/11 all wrong, because we invaded Iraq whom had sfa to do with it...............
... whilst ignoring the COuntry which provided MOST OF the 9/11 hijackers, and which provided most of al Quaeda's funding, and of which Osama bin Laden was a Citizen.
'Why would we do that?'
Don't set me off again...
Im sorry to inform you but osama is not an iraqi Citizen, hes a saudi as is some of the 9/11 hijackers, In the early 1990s Al-Qaeda operated in Sudan. After 1996 its headquarters and about a dozen training camps moved to Afghanistan, where Bin Laden forged a close relationship with the Taleban. oh and al quaedas funding? During the anti-Soviet jihad Bin Laden and his fighters received American and Saudi funding, a foundation of charities, non-governmental organisations, mosques, websites, intermediaries, facilitators and banks.
I think we got Al Qaeda all wrong and that is why 9/11 happened. The Senate report is quite astounding reading, especially the flags that should have been raised and weren't or were raised and ignored
Originally posted by Couer de Lion: I think we got Al Qaeda all wrong and that is why 9/11 happened. The Senate report is quite astounding reading, especially the flags that should have been raised and weren't or were raised and ignored
This was partly deliberate to allow the new laws to come into force to control vast amounts of people, making way for the "new world order"
Originally posted by Couer de Lion: I think we got Al Qaeda all wrong and that is why 9/11 happened. The Senate report is quite astounding reading, especially the flags that should have been raised and weren't or were raised and ignored
This was partly deliberate to allow the new laws to come into force to control vast amounts of people, making way for the "new world order"
Originally posted by Couer de Lion: I think we got Al Qaeda all wrong and that is why 9/11 happened. The Senate report is quite astounding reading, especially the flags that should have been raised and weren't or were raised and ignored
This was partly deliberate to allow the new laws to come into force to control vast amounts of people, making way for the "new world order"
Hmmmmmm
Hmmmmmm? Wall, head, banging - that's me. Sometimes I wonder what it's gonna take to even slightly entertain this notion as a viable possibility. Jack boots thumping up your stairs as you sleep? Give it time CdL; it's not that far off.
Have you ever examined the new Legisaltion brought in and (risibly) entitled the PATRIOT ACT?
It removes US Citizens' Constitutional Rights to: Freedom of Speech; Freedom of Association; the Right to a Fair Trial (actually, the right to ANY trial).
And ALL on the say-so of unelected officials - NOT on the say-so of a Judge.
That's just a few 'highlights' for you.
Welcome to the New World Order.
And remember folks, Crimethinkers unbellyfeel IngSoc.
Originally posted by sounditout: The answer is YES, we did get 9/11 all wrong, because we invaded Iraq whom had sfa to do with it...............
... whilst ignoring the COuntry which provided MOST OF the 9/11 hijackers, and which provided most of al Quaeda's funding, and of which Osama bin Laden was a Citizen.
'Why would we do that?'
Don't set me off again...
That's the official version of 911 you're referring to. This is more in agreement with the evidence.
Have a read and then decide for yourself if anyone who believes this crap really is one step away from people in psychiatric wards who think they are the next in line to the throne!
Have a read and then decide for yourself if anyone who believes this crap really is one step away from people in psychiatric wards who think they are the next in line to the throne!
What exactly is it that you find so objectionable about the article and its source. They've said it's speculative, by the way, but still remains plausible, does it not?