I'm aware the intellectual-debate is a bit lacking across some of these forums, but the level of debate here is depressing.
There is no epidemic of cannabis-related psychosis- which some give the impression there is. There IS and HAS BEEN long-term problems in this country relating to a legal-drug: ALCOHOL. Go and see some people you know in cities and towns across the country: drunk & disorderly arrests, vandalism, violence (domestic violence frequently hand in hand with alcohol)- take a look at casualty-wards & note the instances of alcohol-related injuries/trauma. Go & meet someone in their 30s who's had cyrosis of the liver, or other renal-dysfunction as a result of alcohol-abuse. Recall that alcohol-sales were down in the early 90s as a result of the ecstasy-culture/rave scene- the alcohol-companies came up with alco-pops! & then there has been the glut of reports that have revealed that many people have had sex where perhaps they shouldn't have, as they were under the influence of booze (a far greater problem that date-rape-drugs). STDs and unwanted pregnancies often an indirect result of alcohol-consumption- so I'd point out that a perfectly legal-drug (alcohol) is a far greater problem than drugs (which is a psuedo-war the UK have copied from the US). As J-99 notes, certain drugs are illegal (to a degree- there is a classification)- as a result they exist in the black-economy. Perhaps legalisation would destroy this black-economy- & bring in huge-revenue equal to or greater than that which companies & government make from arms-sales, cigarettes, & alcohol- which are three-things that seem morally-dubious to profit from?
It's nice to see such intellectual descriptions of mental illness, "I know someone on Cannabis who is a pyscho [sic] & is out of control." What a sensitive diagnosis! Still, not as if anyone who's ever got pissed-up has ever got out of control, is it?
RFAD is depressing- so what, if you want happy or idiotic, watch Crap Actually or Legally Blonde. It's an interesting film as it juxtaposes certain people from class/racial background against the drug-trade/black-economy (both of which associated with another illegal trade: prostitution)& then contrasts that with a woman who is initially addicted to junk-food & then to a diet-pill (a legal drug). I can assure you that people who are alcoholics destroy themselves- I work in social-housing & an alcoholic-tenant killed herself after setting her house on fire (for the 5th time). She got 50% burns & died a week or so later in agony- "a pyscho &...out of control"?
& let's note that people with diseases such as MS and cancer have found that cannabis helps where legal-analgesics do not. Do people feel so extreme towards paracetemol, aspirin, solphedeine, codeine, morphine, valium, prozac & the array of legal-drugs you can get perfectly legally? More people consume alcohol, so I'd say that is "far more dangerous" than the pseudo-bugaboo that is drugs.
"The drugs don't work" (nice someone quoting a band who were drug-addled to the max!- on an LSD, dope & William Blake-trip!)- well anything has problems (the Atkins diet, prescription-medication, coca-cola, mcdonalds, cigarettes...throw a rock in the air & you'll find something that is bad for you and/or addictive), but I'd direct you to Bill Hicks, who pointed out that a lot of great art was created because of drugs. Here's a know-all/pretentious list of art/artists who consumed drugs- I'd recommend the book Artificial Paradises by Mike Jay (ed, 1999, Penguin) on this theme:
The poetry of William Blake
Confessions of an Opium-Eater
The Beatles & The Stones (from 1965 onwards, yes that means no Revolver, Sgt Pepper, I am the Walrus etc! Likewise, could you imagine Keef minus chemicals?)
Peak-Dylan (the electric period to The Basement Tapes)
The Stooges
David Bowie (Ziggy to Scary Monsters)
William Burroughs (Naked Lunch, The Soft Machine, Junky etc)
Irvine Welsh (Trainspotting)
Van Gogh (absinthe...)
Oscar Wilde
Hunter S Thompson
Pink Floyd
The Velvet Underground/Lou Reed
Jerry Lee Lewis
Little Richard
Elvis (though he favoured legal-drygs prescribed by the parasites who he employed)
The Band
Miles Davis
Sly & the Family Stone
Aldous Huxley (The Doors of Perception/Heaven & Hell)
Sartre (mescaline!)
Soft Cell in the 80s (ecstasy key here)
New Order (ditto- Blue Monday, Confusion etc as a result of ecstasy in NY- a substance that was only made illegal in the States in 1985. A substance that is related to the legal-drug Sudafed)
Taxi Driver (Scorsese had problems 'till a breakdown during Raging Bull)
Guns'N'Roses/Oasis (their debut LPs were great & made amid a hail of chemicals)
Robert Altman (likes a toke...)
Queens of the Stone Age
Human Traffic (I think it sucks, but lots of people liked it!)
The Prodigy
U2 (when they were interesting- Achtung Baby! to Passengers)
The Stone Roses/Happy Mondays/Madchester
The Punk scene (propelled by alcohol & amphetamines)
Gram Parsons
The Byrds
Neil Young
Suede
Depeche Mode
Primal Scream
The Orb
Easy Rider
From Hell (the graphic novel, rather than the film)
The Invisibles (without Grant Morrison caning the acid you wouldn't have got to The Matrix!)
The works of Philip K Dick (Ubik, A Scanner Darkly- an excellent anti-drugs novel from a grey, rather than black & white area, Do Androids. etc)
Natural Born Killers/Scarface (Oliver Stone with mushrooms & after cocaine-addiction)
Drugstore Cowboy
Johnny Cash (pills & substances both legal/illegal)
...you know, this list could go on and on- so clearly "drugs" are great for culture! Drugs have negative-qualities, sure, but let's get over the black&white/hypocritical hysteria. Have a look at the things you like & wonder if they're connected to drugs- if not, stop being so conservative & pious.
There are reasons why people want to escape- whether booze, drugs, or food- which is another message of RFAD & the works of its writer Hubert Selby Jr. I'd address those issues before merely pointing to drugs, I mean, would you prohibit certain foods due to obesity?
I hardly ever take drugs- I have taken most things & manage to hold down jobs, gain qualifications, & other forms of citizenry-function. I found smoking much harder to give up than the nasty-drugs you folks gripe-about. The one great thing about drugs is the ability it gives you to transcend previously held philosophies. It's an accelerator, it aids the mental-evolution of the human-species (as the above list demonstrates)- perhaps if you're straight-edge you can win this argument, but I severely doubt that. On the whole, I'd say "Just say Yes"- drugs clearly work, why would people have taken them for centuries if that's not the case?????
pinkerton- "get a brain you moron"- excellent level of debate!
- would people who like any of the above list be happy that it didn't exist, as the artist avoided drugs? "Take out your record-collection & destroy it..."
"See you on doomsday!"- Sadegh Hedayat's suicide note