I agree with you because those homes could then be sold some years later for a whopping profit. Wouldn't have been so bad if those buying their council home had done so with a view to staying there for many years. The price of ex council properties took some time to rise but eventually they caught up with everything else.
And, of course they were never replaced either.
I was reading something the other day and I hope it's not true - the woman who plays Heather in Eastenders, the large lady who just married Minty? She apparently lives with her husband in a council house. She said she would not be leaving there and never wanted a mortgage in case times became hard again. So there is someone earning a very good wage who not only doesn't want to give up her tenancy, but doesn't want the RTB either. Another problem with council properties is that once you are in, so long as your behaviour is acceptable is it yours for life.
Okay so many move on if their financial situation allows it but I know of many families who got council houses back in the 80s/90s through 'overcrowding'. Basically you were quite high on the list if you came from a family who were already council tenants and that to introduce a partner/child to one household would be overcrowding. There would be no checks whatsoever on salary earnt, that was usually enough. These people could have easily bought a house back then with 2 salaries coming in but didn't need to and had no desire to when they were all used to being in council properties on their estate. Since then they might well have bought those houses at rock bottom prices but who suffers? The next generation where there aren't enough properties for those in need to get something suitable, never mind those who think they should have one cos the family always has.
*It is not necessary to understand things in order to argue about them. -- Pierre De Beaumarchais