Did I imagine it but earlier on this afternoon I am sure I saw a thread that said Chris Brian kidnaps Anna, the Sharks are punished as they go and get her and both islands have to give someone up. The tigers give up Kev and John volunteers to go to tigers. Am I going mad and has Shipwrecked taken over my life so much that I am imagining things or can someone else say they saw it to. I know there were replies to the thread by names I've not seen too often before. Have I lost the plot ???
I warn poss spoiler as I don't know if this is true or not, seems out of order if it is as the tigers get away with Kev going back when he would have done anyway.

That would make sense actually. I never saw that post though.

I hope that doesnt happen though because that's out of order, Kev would have become a shark again next week anyway. If that did happen would John be allowed to put himself up for nomination?I am guessing no.

yep

.
.
.
this post will be deleted in 10 seconds
9
8
7
6

Thanks Mujaji - think you were on there earlier, was the post deleted ? why when there have been loads of threads over the months with spoilers on and the one I saw today wasn't any different was it ? That explains why I can't find it then...

how do we know that Kevin didnt put himself up also...

anyways he may have gone back to the sharks but he was a tiger at the time this situation occurred.
we dont know if this occurred after the newbie choose the island or the nominating of the fellow castaways.
I feel Kevin didnt put himself up this week then the situation of john nominating himself and tiger choosing someone happened...

we are just going by what people said.

I'm sure the same thread also said the new Welsh guy goes to Sharks. If it's true I mean it's wrong as John gives himself up to go over, the tigers give back a Shark really as it's alomst inevitiable that Kev would be going back either this week or next. The Sharks actually lose an original but if the tigers give up Kev, they are only giving him back rather than them say lose the likes of Crawford, Brain etc and that seems unfair as seeing as we currently believe tigers start the whole situation by kidnapping Anna the punishment would have much more of an effect on the Sharks and I think this is unfair.

quote:

Originally posted by CTUCK:
Thanks Mujaji - think you were on there earlier, was the post deleted ? why when there have been loads of threads over the months with spoilers on and the one I saw today wasn't any different was it ? That explains why I can't find it then...

I think because we are pretty sure who wins now. And the information is getting more accurate. They are probably worried it will also affect ratings. So I cant imagine this thread lasting.

I've also noticed that sites that post the episodes summary 2 weeks in advance have stopped doing that. The production company are probably only release a week in advance now.

Sharks win!

mujaji - who do you think will win then ?

do you want to know?

What do you think ?????

Hurry up and spill your guts ...

heh heh. Let me highlight it then

Sharks win ! woo hoo!

SHARKS TO WIN! SHARKS WIN! SHARK DO WIN! SHARK TO WIN! SHARKS TO WIN! SHARKS TO WIN!

im really sure if the tigers choose Kevin and wasnt fair, the producer/creators would have stopped filming and told them to choose another member to make it fair. i really dont think a tv company would let this happen - do you?

I dont think a TV company really cares. The more controversy the higher the ratings.

i didnt realise the other thread was deleted

No I think it's well out of order if it's true, I am asking if anyone else saw the thread as I wanted to make sure. I think there were other replies that said it was done as the sharks are wining at the moment, the new guy goes to sharks and then for kev to nominate and go back the sharks lead would be too big at this stage of the game. So they allow Kev to be sent back and the tigers get John who volunteers to do it - which explains necklace photo and comment someone made about John rooting for the sharks at the end - didn't see either myself just read threads at the time. So according to the source who's name I can't remember this is why they allow it - but still you either play the game the hole way through or you don't and it just seems wrong to me. Hope I made sense

Mujaji - If you're right I'm having a party and you can come xx

quote:

Originally posted by mujaji:
I dont think a TV company really cares. The more controversy the higher the ratings.

fixing a programme as this would be doing, favortism towards another group could loose their contract for another series....

the have to follow the law and rules...

The producers will want as nail biting a finish as possible. They will do this to even up numbers on the island.
This thread will be deleted.

I mean winning and whole, as rather than wining and hole !!!! brains cells evaporated when I had my kids !!!

quote:

Originally posted by Lost Fan:

quote:

Originally posted by mujaji:
I dont think a TV company really cares. The more controversy the higher the ratings.

fixing a programme as this would be doing, favortism towards another group could loose their contract for another series....

the have to follow the law and rules...

Reality tv programs are manipulated all the time !

quote:

Originally posted by Indigo Moon:

quote:

Originally posted by Lost Fan:

quote:

Originally posted by mujaji:
I dont think a TV company really cares. The more controversy the higher the ratings.

fixing a programme as this would be doing, favortism towards another group could loose their contract for another series....

the have to follow the law and rules...

Reality tv programs are manipulated all the time !

the law?

I'm going to start laughing again.

quote:

Originally posted by CTUCK:
Mujaji - If you're right I'm having a party and you can come xx

I hope so WOO HOOOOO!

I'm there!

mujaji, have you given me a fact or specualtion ? if it's a fact is your source reliable ????

Invisible? Don said it. But sounded very convincing. One clue in its authenticity for me is the fact that they're suddenly deleting any related thread like it's the plague...

Source sounded plausible but how can you tell?
Fact thread deleted quickly could be more evidence that it was true.

Mujaji need to know, you have made no secrets of favouring the Sharks--so is your statement based on fact or is it just the outcome you wish to happen. Basically what is the basis for your statement.