Go 
|
New 
|
Find 
|
Notify 
|
|
Reply 
|
|
Admin 
|
New PM! 
|

|
Lewes,
I think a trend is developing - we have the passion to develop a play, but lack the willingness/candour/ad-exec-ness to develop the synopsis. I guess this is why the 'names' have agents and we still have dreams.
I know this is an area I have to develop - but at the end of the day Yeah, the world cup's on so I have to use the cr*p old lines) I'd sooner develop the next play than have to rehash my 105 min materpiece into one page of A4 courier... I'd sooner someone read it and gave me their opinion.
|
| |
|

|
Jay, I would like to remind you of a line in the Disney classic "The Aristocats":
If you're smart, you'll learn by heart What every artist knows You must learn your scales And your arppegios
I think these wise words spoken by Duchess (the voice of Zsa Zsa Gabor) apply to synopses. You can't win a gold medal ice skating if you can't nail the technical work and you can't win a performance if you can't nail the synopsis.
The argument is this: if you can't be bothered to work up the energy to create a one-page version of your play, then who will be bothered to read it? Writing a synopsis is a good exercise to help you understand the play as well as other people.
Hmmm.
Swann
|
| |
|

|
So that's telling YOU Lt.Saunders!
Actually, I know what Swann means. Once I'd submitted my first play to TPTT I looked back at it and thought "Hang on, I think this is funny, but does it meet the brief?" and I realised that whilst it might make a good local / amdram show, for a large stage it was nothing.
So I deliberately, consciously and callously sat down to write a synopsis which I thought "met the brief" - and my as-yet unwritten historical comedy is, I think, much better.
I wonder how many of us - and I count me in - failed to cover every single tiny angle in our TPTT submissions? Because I bet there were many otherwise worthwhile submisions that got rejected on such small detail?
Or, perversely, would failing to have complied with every detail have made us look more like candidates they could give a dramatic tv treatment to; 'benefitting from a development process'? (In the same way, maybe, that BB contestants could 'benefit from a reality check'!)
I guess we'll have an idea on that tonight!
|
| |
|

|
[QUOTE]Originally posted by TheAdMan: So that's telling YOU Lt.Saunders!
QUOTE]
Hey, sorry, was I too much there? Too bossypants? Apologies . . .
|
| |
|

|
I think you were 100% spot on!
A wise man listen to all advice and filters out what he needs. Only a fool takes offence, and I know Jay well enough to know he won't!
|
| |
|

|
Thank you, Adman. I read the Metro blurb on the show tonight. It said TTPT was full of earnest discussions and red wine. Maybe we can learn something from it . . .
|
| |
|

|
quote: Hey, sorry, was I too much there? Too bossypants? Apologies . . .
Nope you were spot on! I know that I have to learn how to write the dangged things - but it doesn't mean that I'm going to enjoy it. It's like taking medicine to me - I hate it, but I know it will do me good in the long run. And I have been reworking my syns... I've nearly flight-tested the PC a couple of time now, but I'll get there in the edit.
|
| |
|

|
Okay, so I've made a second attempt at this Synopsis. And I know that it's still not right. But I'm looking for ideas on what I've improved, what I've made worse and where I'm going wrong.
As always, thanks for your time
_____________________________ SYNOPSIS – Denim
Giles has a fear. To those around him, they see this fear as irrational, but to Giles, it is the most rational of all fears. He’s scared that he’s going to sleep with his sister.
Giles was adopted when he was six weeks of age in the late 1960’s. Now rapidly approaching his forties, he remains a virgin, lives with his father (Stuart) in his pub (the setting for the play). He feels trapped as a journalist in a local paper and holds two ambitions: To become a successful author and meet the woman of his dreams. Both of these ambitions thwarted by the fact that as he doesn’t know if he has any birth siblings, he’s scared that any woman that he meets is going to turn out to be his sister.
Pete is the local wide-boy. His success with women is astounding when you consider that everyone knows he’s after one thing. He feels that it’s his duty to educate Giles how to get the women on your terms. Zoë on the other hand wants Giles to find real love and endeavours to teach him (with the aid of a rather tasty practical) the emotional needs of women. Doug chips in with his comments, but considering that he’s three sheets to the wind at all times, no one really pays too much heed. And Stuart just longs for a bit of female company to replace the hole caused by the loss of his wife.
A rowdy birthday party takes over the pub and at last Giles finds love in the form of April, a mature architecture student. Her mother, Hazel, treats her more like a friend than a daughter, and spotting her with Giles encourages her to try it on with Stuart. Hazel’s drunken friend Sybil, finally finds love in the form of Doug. It may not be a meeting of minds, more a share of liver cells. As Hazel and Stuart discuss bringing their kids up alone, Hazel discovers that Giles is the child she gave way 30 plus years ago and that Giles’s fear has been realised.
This is too much for mortal man to control. But in truth the events have little to do with mortal man. The ever present, yet unseen to the central cast, demon and angel have been trying to pair Giles off. Acting as joint narrators, it was them that brought the party to the pub, that gave Giles the chance to talk to the woman of his dreams – and ruin not Giles’s, but Stuart’s life. With all of their input, it would appear that the only people that are happy are the two drunkards that are doing the dirty in the toilets.
Everyone now has to try and repair parental relationships and convince love’s-not-quite-so-young’s-dream that it’s not really okay to want to procreate with your sibling. Even with the assistance of heaven and hell, this is going to take a while, a few drinks and maybe a stripper. _____________________________________
|
| |
|

|
Dear Jay: I thought about this overnight and here are my comments. Best wishes from Swann quote: Originally posted by JaysPlays: Okay, so I've made a second attempt at this Synopsis. And I know that it's still not right. But I'm looking for ideas on what I've improved, what I've made worse and where I'm going wrong.
As always, thanks for your time
_____________________________ SYNOPSIS – Denim
Giles has a fear. To those around him, they see this fear as irrational, but to Giles, it is the most rational of all fears. He’s scared that he’s going to sleep with his sister.
POINT: The play is about Giles reconciling with his mother. It is not about him being scared about sleeping with his sister - that's just the device you use to introduce the fact that he is adopted. So sum up the whole play in two sentences and start your synopsis there.
POINT: Why does everyone stay in the pub throughout the action of the story? What is the dramatic device that holds them there?
Giles was adopted when he was six weeks of age in the late 1960’s. Now rapidly approaching his forties, he remains a virgin, lives with his father (Stuart) in his pub (the setting for the play). He feels trapped as a journalist in a local paper and holds two ambitions: To become a successful author and meet the woman of his dreams. Both of these ambitions thwarted by the fact that as he doesn’t know if he has any birth siblings, he’s scared that any woman that he meets is going to turn out to be his sister.
POINT: Don't give us background like this in the synopsis. Tell us a story: one night in a pub Giles found the mother who had abandoned him 30 years ago. If you insist on mentioning the fear of sister shagging, you need an immediate reason why this fear has come to the fore NOW. A fear is a background thing, not an inciting incident that kicks off the aciton of the play and starts things rolling.
Pete is the local wide-boy. His success with women is astounding when you consider that everyone knows he’s after one thing. He feels that it’s his duty to educate Giles how to get the women on your terms.
POINT: The night Giles met his long-lost mother, his friend Pete was trying to teach him to score with women. I have just said with one sentence all you have written so far.
Zoë on the other hand wants Giles to find real love and endeavours to teach him (with the aid of a rather tasty practical) the emotional needs of women.
POINT: How is Zoe connected to Giles? We need that info for the synopsis. Why is she in the pub?
Doug chips in with his comments, but considering that he’s three sheets to the wind at all times, no one really pays too much heed. And Stuart just longs for a bit of female company to replace the hole caused by the loss of his wife.
POINT: YOu have introduced a group of characters and have told us about their interior lives. More professional to tell us something about their exterior appearance that hints at their interior lives - synopsis is what happens, not what is in people's hearts. Also, again, we don't know why and how Doug, Stuart, Zoe are connected to Giles and his dad (who have also been mentioned. Don't introduce a character until they come into the story and then tell us what they DO not what they ARE. Why are they there? It could be as simple as fellow publicans striking up a conversation on a drunken night but we need a clear idea why. Also, if a character does not figure importantly in the story, leave them out of the synopsis and put them in the character list. And food for thought: if you cannot tell the reader in one sentence with an active verb what happens with a character, then maybe you don't know and should know. Maybe you don't need that character.
A rowdy birthday party takes over the pub and at last Giles finds love in the form of April, a mature architecture student.
POINT: He MEETS April. He doesn't find love. How are all these characters you have mentioned related to the birthday party? The Birthday party also sounds a little like unnecessary window dressing - deus ex machina. How is it integral to the plot? Who's birthday?
Her mother, Hazel, treats her more like a friend than a daughter, and spotting her with Giles encourages her to try it on with Stuart.
Point: April is in the bar with her mother who encourages her to flirt with Stuart?
Hazel’s drunken friend Sybil, finally finds love in the form of Doug.
POINT: Enough characters - way too many being introduced without a sense of what happens.
It may not be a meeting of minds, more a share of liver cells. As Hazel and Stuart discuss bringing their kids up alone, Hazel discovers that Giles is the child she gave way 30 plus years ago and that Giles’s fear has been realised.
POINT: Hazel discovers. That's good. But how has Giles' fears been realised? Who has he slept with? I'm confused. The synopsis should be clear.
This is too much for mortal man to control. But in truth the events have little to do with mortal man. The ever present, yet unseen to the central cast, demon and angel have been trying to pair Giles off.
POINT: You haven't even told us much about this large cast and how they are relating and now we get two more characters. Why do you need them? Are they the inciters of the action of the play? If so, should they be mentioned in the aforementioned two sentence summary?
Acting as joint narrators, it was them that brought the party to the pub, that gave Giles the chance to talk to the woman of his dreams – and ruin not Giles’s, but Stuart’s life.
POINT: You may know how Gile's life is not ruined and Stuart's is but all we know is that a lot of drunk people are flirting in a pub and one is Giles' mother. THis sentence makes no sense to me.
With all of their input, it would appear that the only people that are happy are the two drunkards that are doing the dirty in the toilets.
POInT: INcidental action like this can be left out of the synopsis.
Everyone now has to try and repair parental relationships and convince love’s-not-quite-so-young’s-dream that it’s not really okay to want to procreate with your sibling.
POINT: THis would be great if there was a theatrical external pressure that demanded this motivation for resultion. As it is, you have just decided that at this point in the evening this has to happen: how do the events lead inevitably, inescapably and remarkably to this conclusion?
Even with the assistance of heaven and hell, this is going to take a while, a few drinks and maybe a stripper.
POINT: DOn't hint at what may happen, say what does happen. Say what space these narrators take up - do the angel and the demon invade the pub? How does the reality of the play hang together? If a stripper shows up and that's how it ends, then say it.
Brutal, I know, but if Denim is a good play, this synopsis does not do it justice.
All good vibes and support from your fellow struggling playwright
Swann
_____________________________________
|
| |
|

|
Jay
Okay, what do I know? But here's my ten pennorth anyway, because I do know the play.
Firstoff, I think the synopsis is too long - by the time I got to the end of it even I was forgetting the plot, and I know it! Howabout;
Giles has a problem. As an adopted child who never knew his parents, he has always feared entering into a sexual relationship with a girl.
Pete has a problem. Although he might play the local Casanova, it's all show; he pines for just one woman who has continually ignored him.
Doug has a problem. It's simply called alcohol.
Stuart, Giles' adoptive father, has a problem. He's lonely.
So where do people go to talk over their problems? The pub. Stuart's pub, to be exact. And in this particular pub, on this particular day, there are customers, naturally; Zoe, April and Sybil, and Sybil's mother Hazel.
Four guys. Four girls. The maths start to add up. Until two of the customers emerge to be not so much natural as supernatural. And they have their own agenda.
It's a comedy about relationships. About the difficulty of forming them - and keeping them. About the male/female divide. But most of all, it's about how fate can really screw things up!
Because as Giles breaks a rule of a lifetime and falls for Sybil, her mother has an awful confession to make...
Cast 13 (7M 6F). Single box set. Some adult language. Running time 1hr50.
Hmmm... any closer? It probably breaks some of Swan's rules, though.
BTW Jay - it's never occurred to me before, but isn't a cast of 13 just a tad overweight?
|
| |
|

|
Apologies, Jay - I looked at the synopsis again and you do say that Stuart is Giles' father and that it is Stuart's pub.
|
| |
|


|
I'd join in but I'm really hungover
-Every rose has its thorns. Mine are all sticking in my side.
|
| |
|

|
Is it only Hazel who figures out that she is Giles' mother or does Stuart? Does everyone?
Does Hazel try to steer Giles away from April before or after she realizes she is his mother?
Why does Hazel 'happen' to be in the pub that night? If she was steered by the angel and demon, why? Why her?
|
| |
|

|
Thaks for all the input - I knew that this needs a lot of work!
The premise is about Giles fear - not a reconsiliation with his 'mother'. Hazel realises that she is Giles's mother after she sees that April and Giles have fallen for each other.
Giles was ready to take the next step - and suddenly his fear is realised.
Obviously a lot of work to do... Makes me want to take a workshop on synopsis writing!
|
| |
|

|
Does Giles ever find out?
|
| |
|

|
Oh boy does he ever - it's the cliffhanger at the end of Act 1...
I hate this synopsis phase...
I know that I can write a play (Denim - along with most of my full lenght plays - has been performed to excellent reviews and has attracted more than 10 awards).
But can I write a synopsis? Nope! Maybe becuase I feel like I'm blowing my own trumpet.
Must do a Google for synopsis writing workshops - I feel like I'm making no headway here!
|
| |
|

|
quote: and falls for Sybil
AdMan - LOL  Now there's a plot twist I didn't think of! (I know this means nothing to anyone that hasn't read the play - but Sybil is the last person that Giles would fall for!). I'll try again from scratch tonight!
|
| |
|

|
I wonder if the winning play will generate as much interest as Jays Synopsis? Also how much do you charge for writing a synopsis for other peoples plays Adman? (prospective client speeking)
'All we see and seem is but a dream within a dream' Poe
|
| |
|

|
Hey - I'm not ashamed to get some free advertising here!  So if there are any producers here, then you can contact me on... 
|
| |
|

|
Sorry, Jay, slip of the brain.
I meant, of course, that Giles discovers his love for Doug!
|
| |
|

|
I think it would be interesting if the angel or the demon got it on with the drunk girl.
Or maybe rabid zombie squirrels attack the pub?
|
| |
|

|
Or what if Giles was contemplating gender reassignment surgery? Because April is a lesbian?
|
| |
|


|
I wonder if the winning play will generate as much interest as Jays Synopsis?
Not from here, regretfully.
I'm finding the programme (after a long wait) a bit of an anti-climax.
So Scary Kate wins; with Steve aka Benny Hill and Iain Adman MkII as the runners-up?
I've read the first act of Denim (as was) and at the moment it's more interesting than anything I've heard on TPTT.
|
| |
|
|