quote:

Originally posted by Tarnhari:

quote:

Originally posted by ugetmi:

quote:

Originally posted by Tarnhari:

quote:

Originally posted by Miss Dee:
Tarnhari

You're making yourself clearer and clearer, but I still find your complete identification of genes (or just skin colour) with culture to be a strange one. It seems to fly in the face of the reality of globalisation, pluralism and identity formation.

Plus, complaining about the imposition of multiracialism/multiculturalism is bizarre when you consider that ethnically British people have been spreading their genes around the world for centuries!

No, race is far more than just skin colour. Other physical characteristics come into play as well.
And of course there are the very different behavioural and intellectual differences. Just as no two people are the same no two peoples or races are either.
Most peoples `identity formation` is based upon their racial origins. Those who seek to stray beyond nature`s limits such as `wiggers` end up confused, isolated, ridiculed and rejected by both their own people and the race that they would seek to mimic.
Constant talk about `globalism` does not eradicate the reality of race and racial differences.
It suits the agenda of global capitalism to eradicate all differences based on nationality, race and culture. It is more convenient for the Coca-Cola anti-culture that the world be reduced to a `global village`, a one shoe size fits all society for the manufacture and sale of their shoddy goods. The `democratic` politicians are all part of the process.
There is no such thing as an `ethnically British` person unless you are referring to a Welsh or Cornishman! Anyway to address your point I do not support the practice of `spreading one`s genes around the world` as I think you may have gathered by now!

Races are not a barrier of nature. What barrier is this? I don't think there is a 'natural' barrier at all.

As for white people adapting popular cultural influences like rap and dressing in 'street' styles, being ridiculed. They are only ridiculed in the same way that a person brought up in, say rural Cambridgeshire, would be if they tried to speak with a cockney accent. And this is simply because it sounds out of character to their upbringing.

Whatever you think about rap etc, there's a hell of a lot of white people who like it and take their influences from it. R&B/Rap are THE most popular forms of music and influences of fashion this country. Personally, I mostly don't like either, but that's not the point.

One problem with sharing a common language with Americans is that we do have their media and culture rammed down our throats. Just the same as we watch their films, use their business clichés, eat their burgers, enevitably we listen to their music, and their most popular music is Rap/R&B.

I didn`t use the term `barrier`: you did!
Europeans have inherited the most advanced culture in the world. Why any European would choose to adopt an alien culture which is focused around calling women `biatches`, violent crime, drugs and hatred of white people is beyond me. Perhaps these people are mentally deficient?

quote:

Originally posted by ugetmi:

quote:

Originally posted by Tarnhari:

quote:

Originally posted by ugetmi:

quote:

Originally posted by Tarnhari:

quote:

Originally posted by Miss Dee:
Tarnhari

You're making yourself clearer and clearer, but I still find your complete identification of genes (or just skin colour) with culture to be a strange one. It seems to fly in the face of the reality of globalisation, pluralism and identity formation.

Plus, complaining about the imposition of multiracialism/multiculturalism is bizarre when you consider that ethnically British people have been spreading their genes around the world for centuries!

No, race is far more than just skin colour. Other physical characteristics come into play as well.
And of course there are the very different behavioural and intellectual differences. Just as no two people are the same no two peoples or races are either.
Most peoples `identity formation` is based upon their racial origins. Those who seek to stray beyond nature`s limits such as `wiggers` end up confused, isolated, ridiculed and rejected by both their own people and the race that they would seek to mimic.
Constant talk about `globalism` does not eradicate the reality of race and racial differences.
It suits the agenda of global capitalism to eradicate all differences based on nationality, race and culture. It is more convenient for the Coca-Cola anti-culture that the world be reduced to a `global village`, a one shoe size fits all society for the manufacture and sale of their shoddy goods. The `democratic` politicians are all part of the process.
There is no such thing as an `ethnically British` person unless you are referring to a Welsh or Cornishman! Anyway to address your point I do not support the practice of `spreading one`s genes around the world` as I think you may have gathered by now!

Races are not a barrier of nature. What barrier is this? I don't think there is a 'natural' barrier at all.

As for white people adapting popular cultural influences like rap and dressing in 'street' styles, being ridiculed. They are only ridiculed in the same way that a person brought up in, say rural Cambridgeshire, would be if they tried to speak with a cockney accent. And this is simply because it sounds out of character to their upbringing.

Whatever you think about rap etc, there's a hell of a lot of white people who like it and take their influences from it. R&B/Rap are THE most popular forms of music and influences of fashion this country. Personally, I mostly don't like either, but that's not the point.

One problem with sharing a common language with Americans is that we do have their media and culture rammed down our throats. Just the same as we watch their films, use their business clichés, eat their burgers, enevitably we listen to their music, and their most popular music is Rap/R&B.

I didn`t use the term `barrier`: you did!
Europeans have inherited the most advanced culture in the world. Why any European would choose to adopt an alien culture which is focused around calling women `biatches`, violent crime, drugs and hatred of white people is beyond me. Perhaps these people are mentally deficient?

Your quote:

Those who seek to stray beyond nature`s limits such as `wiggers` end up confused, isolated, ridiculed and rejected by both their own people and the race that they would seek to mimic.

quote:

Originally posted by Stormer88:

quote:

Originally posted by ugetmi:

quote:

Originally posted by Tarnhari:

quote:

Originally posted by ugetmi:

quote:

Originally posted by Tarnhari:

quote:

Originally posted by Miss Dee:
Tarnhari

You're making yourself clearer and clearer, but I still find your complete identification of genes (or just skin colour) with culture to be a strange one. It seems to fly in the face of the reality of globalisation, pluralism and identity formation.

Plus, complaining about the imposition of multiracialism/multiculturalism is bizarre when you consider that ethnically British people have been spreading their genes around the world for centuries!

No, race is far more than just skin colour. Other physical characteristics come into play as well.
And of course there are the very different behavioural and intellectual differences. Just as no two people are the same no two peoples or races are either.
Most peoples `identity formation` is based upon their racial origins. Those who seek to stray beyond nature`s limits such as `wiggers` end up confused, isolated, ridiculed and rejected by both their own people and the race that they would seek to mimic.
Constant talk about `globalism` does not eradicate the reality of race and racial differences.
It suits the agenda of global capitalism to eradicate all differences based on nationality, race and culture. It is more convenient for the Coca-Cola anti-culture that the world be reduced to a `global village`, a one shoe size fits all society for the manufacture and sale of their shoddy goods. The `democratic` politicians are all part of the process.
There is no such thing as an `ethnically British` person unless you are referring to a Welsh or Cornishman! Anyway to address your point I do not support the practice of `spreading one`s genes around the world` as I think you may have gathered by now!

Races are not a barrier of nature. What barrier is this? I don't think there is a 'natural' barrier at all.

As for white people adapting popular cultural influences like rap and dressing in 'street' styles, being ridiculed. They are only ridiculed in the same way that a person brought up in, say rural Cambridgeshire, would be if they tried to speak with a cockney accent. And this is simply because it sounds out of character to their upbringing.

Whatever you think about rap etc, there's a hell of a lot of white people who like it and take their influences from it. R&B/Rap are THE most popular forms of music and influences of fashion this country. Personally, I mostly don't like either, but that's not the point.

One problem with sharing a common language with Americans is that we do have their media and culture rammed down our throats. Just the same as we watch their films, use their business clichés, eat their burgers, enevitably we listen to their music, and their most popular music is Rap/R&B.

I didn`t use the term `barrier`: you did!
Europeans have inherited the most advanced culture in the world. Why any European would choose to adopt an alien culture which is focused around calling women `biatches`, violent crime, drugs and hatred of white people is beyond me. Perhaps these people are mentally deficient?

Your quote:

Those who seek to stray beyond nature`s limits such as `wiggers` end up confused, isolated, ridiculed and rejected by both their own people and the race that they would seek to mimic.

Where exactly did he write `barrier`?