Welcome to the Science Forum Return to Homepage
    C4 Forums    Science    Science Forum    Another one bites the dust?...
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Four Silver Stars
Posted
Latest adjustments to the GISS (Goddard Institute for Space Studies) temperature records depended on by the AGW lobby now show the 15 hottest years since 1880 are spread over seven decades! Even worse for the 'warmers', the more accurate data now shows FOUR of the 10 hottest years on record were in the 1930s and the hottest year is 1934 instead of 1998. This lays to rest such enviro-tosh as spouted by the likes of Al Gore in which he claims nine of the 10 hottest years have been in the last decade and removes a very large pillar of hysteria stirred up by the heavily funded AGW lobby.

Canadian researcher Steve McIntyre uncovered the faulty data and the pro-AGW GISS has quietly adjusted their temperature figures without bothering to make any formal announcement of their error.

Although the adjustments are small and relate to US temperature records only, they are significant as surface temperature readings cover only half the planet today and less than a quarter before Word War Two - so US readings are among the most reliable there are covering a period back to 1880.

Full report here...link
 
Posts: 315Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
One Gold Star
Picture of realprimate
Posted Hide Post
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Roger58:
QUOTE]

Let's play spot the difference.

http://tamino.wordpress.com/2007/08/12/before-and-after/
 
Posts: 567Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Three Gold Stars
Picture of Lucibee
Posted Hide Post
That's not a full report - that's just a newspaper article!



¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸ ¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸ buzz buzz buzz¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸ ¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸
 
Posts: 1725Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Three Gold Stars
Picture of Lucibee
Posted Hide Post
And I was referring to the link Roger58 provided.

Thanks, Realprimate, that certainly clarifies things!



¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸ ¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸ buzz buzz buzz¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸ ¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸
 
Posts: 1725Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Two Gold Stars
Posted Hide Post
Sadly the story is not true.

1998 and 2005 are still the two hottest years (depending on whether you use Nasa or UK data), and 9 of the 10 hottest years still happened in the last 10 years.

1934 and 1998 comparisons relate to the United States only. The 1930's in the US were the dustbowl years of exceptionally hot weather for the time, and previously (and now) the two years were within 0.02C of each other.

The US only covers 2% of the earth's surface, so a small change to its data will have a very small change overall.

Given your usual attitude to the debate I wonder whether I should comment on your psychological needs to believe this story without first checking whether it is true, but I won't Smile
 
Posts: 1132Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
One Gold Star
Picture of realprimate
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Lucibee:
And I was referring to the link Roger58 provided.

Thanks, Realprimate, that certainly clarifies things!


Thank you Lucibee. Twas courtesy of one of Realclimate's heavyweight posters. Incidently RealClimate have an article on the GISS temp thing. I was surprised to learn that the USA covers less than 2% of the world area.

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2007/08/1934-and-all-that/
 
Posts: 567Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Three Gold Stars
Picture of Lucibee
Posted Hide Post
It's why the US tend to use the Mercator projection in maps of the world coz it makes them look bigger and makes Africa look smaller.

Mercator controversy



¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸ ¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸ buzz buzz buzz¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸ ¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸
 
Posts: 1725Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 

    C4 Forums    Science    Science Forum    Another one bites the dust?...