Now we won't want that, would we? After all it is good fun to read the poorly constructed arguments of pro AGW lobby that are borne not out any real thought process but out of deep conviction that if so many believe something to be right, it has to be!
Originally posted by What's in your mind: Now we won't want that, would we? After all it is good fun to read the poorly constructed arguments of pro AGW lobby that are borne not out any real thought process but out of deep conviction that if so many believe something to be right, it has to be!
Fun? .... how dare you? Wasting all that power! ... you nasty immoral person! ;-)
Originally posted by What's in your mind: Now we won't want that, would we? After all it is good fun to read the poorly constructed arguments of pro AGW lobby that are borne not out any real thought process but out of deep conviction that if so many believe something to be right, it has to be!
Oh the anti-AGW argument is so well constructed:
"The original Nasa data was very wiggly-lined and we wanted the simplest line we could find" - Martin Durkin.
Originally posted by Arcana69: Me? .... my hamster is running at full speed turning his little wheel driven generator like crazy ... but don't tell the Animal Liberation Front!
LOL - That's nothing I'm straped to an execsice bicycle driven generator and have to peddle at least 10mph to be able to use my computer - the problem is I have thighs like a rhinoceroses’ rump with arms like a gibbon's.
Originally posted by Arcana69: Because any true GW believer would not be wasting valuable energy by running his/her computer just to post on a forum. ;-)
Hey! Some of us are all for global warming you know. I don't know if consuming energy will do the trick, but it's worth a try.
- That's nothing I'm straped to an execsice bicycle driven generator and have to peddle at least 10mph to be able to use my computer - the problem is I have thighs like a rhinoceroses’ rump with arms like a gibbon's.
