Welcome to the Science Forum Return to Homepage
    C4 Forums    Science    Science Forum    Volcanoes equivalent to just 1%
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Three Silver Stars
Posted
Regarding the claim regarding volcanoes on The Great Global Warming Swindle :

http://volcanoes.usgs.gov/Hazards/What/VolGas/volgas.html
quote:
Comparison of CO2 emissions from volcanoes vs. human activities.
Scientists have calculated that volcanoes emit between about 130-230 million tonnes (145-255 million tons) of CO2 into the atmosphere every year (Gerlach, 1999, 1992). This estimate includes both subaerial and submarine volcanoes, about in equal amounts. Emissions of CO2 by human activities, including fossil fuel burning, cement production, and gas flaring, amount to about 22 billion tonnes per year (24 billion tons) ( ( Marland, et al., 1998) - The reference gives the amount of released carbon (C), rather than CO2.). Human activities release more than 150 times the amount of CO2 emitted by volcanoes--the equivalent of nearly 17,000 additional volcanoes like Kilauea (Kilauea emits about 13.2 million tonnes/year)!

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2007/03/swindled/
quote:

They also stated that volcanic emissions of CO2 far exceeded those from human activity. This is untrue. Annual emissions from volcanoes are only 1% of the amount emitted to the atmosphere by humans.

A free download on this is at http://www.bgs.ac.uk/programmes/landres/segs/downloads/...nicContributions.pdf

quote:
equivalent to just 1%


Some how I believe the US Geological Survey (USGS) and British Geological Survey (BGS) know a thing or two about volcanoes...

Why is it that people just blindly believe what they see on the TV?
 
Posts: 151Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Four Silver Stars
Posted Hide Post
http://www.springerlink.com/content/631t022372116213/

"...in the recently published eruption chronology of Hirschboeck (1980), a volcanic input of about 1.5 x 10^11 moles CO2 yr-1 was determined for the period 1800-1969. The period 1800-1899 had a somewhat lower input than 1900-1969, which could well be related more to completeness of observational data than to a real increase in volcanic CO2.
This input is well below man's current CO2 production of 4-5 x 10^14 moles CO2 yr-1. "

I make it less than 1% from the above source, nearer 0.1%. The source may be out of date.

But hey, blogger-all or less than blogger-all the message is the same.
 
Posts: 313Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
There are many causes of world-wide C02 (and Methane, et al) outputs in the world. Is there a simple 'agreed' list of scientists' current estimates of each these (even approx), and of what each thing makes per annum ? E.G. Algae/krill xxx%, rotting veg xxx%, ionisation xxx%, "human-activity" xxx% (preferably split into home/industry/transposrt/flight/etc), etc etc...

THEN we can start to debate...

TIG4
 
Posts: 2Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Three Silver Stars
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by TIG4:
There are many causes of world-wide C02 (and Methane, et al) outputs in the world. Is there a simple 'agreed' list of scientists' current estimates of each these (even approx), and of what each thing makes per annum ? E.G. Algae/krill xxx%, rotting veg xxx%, ionisation xxx%, "human-activity" xxx% (preferably split into home/industry/transposrt/flight/etc), etc etc...

THEN we can start to debate...

TIG4
Please post your list here.
 
Posts: 151Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Picture of Ezkerraldean
Posted Hide Post
what was the claim made on GGWS? my suspicion is that it was unsubstantiated bullsheet......
 
Posts: 12Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 

    C4 Forums    Science    Science Forum    Volcanoes equivalent to just 1%