Originally posted by realprimate:
quote:
Originally posted by Mubbers:
quote:
Originally posted by TrueSceptic:
quote:
Originally posted by Mubbers:
Why would there be any cheery bits?
It is not in the IPCC's interest to give any cheery bits and I certainly don't expect any thing recycled by environmentalists such as "desmogblog.com" to present anything approaching a balanced relfection of any report.
Why would desmogblog need to give an unbalanced relection of a report when that report is already unbalanced (IYO of course)?
Sort of like beer: double filtered for extra bias!
Why would there be any cheery bits?
Mubbers - what's known in the trade as a "rhetorical question".
Sort of like beer: double filtered for extra bias!
You implying it's too cautious? That it hasn't taken into account the latest research on sea ice, etc?
